On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:24:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:56 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: > > > I'm not sure what purpose does the URL field serve nowadays but it looks like it > > can be removed from the spec file (and RPM for that matter)! > > No, please. It could be made *optional*. But there are certainly cases > where the upstream is non-discoverable - the generic-release one is a > fun one, for instance. There are cases where a project has forked, and > Google does not make it particularly obvious which side of the fork is > which. It's not a useless field. I'd vote for optional, but there are plenty of other useless fields in spec files. Group, for instance. Considering we don't even use those groupings. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Manager, Installer Engineering Team Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
