On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 12:54 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: >> Hi guys, >> I've started working to identify packages with missing upstream test suites or >> not running the tests in %check. Having a list of hundreds of packages now I >> need to prioritize them somehow. This will help in later steps when spec files >> need to be fixed or somebody wants to start working with upstream on writing a >> test suite. >> >> My idea is to take all bugs against Fedora in the last few years (or releases). >> Packages with bigger number of bugs receive higher priority than those with >> less. Then based on this prioritize. >> >> >> How long should the time frame be? I'm thinking 3 to 5 years. >> >> >> Where low/medium/high priority boundaries are ? (could be 30%, 60%, 90% for >> example). >> >> >> Do you have other ideas how to calculate priority of these items? > > Anything on critpath - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_package - should probably > go straight to high priority. Except the kernel. Please exclude it from all of this. josh -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
