Re: Moving away from reporting to RH bugzilla and adopting pure upstream reporting mantra.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Wildeboer (jwildebo@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> How will you track blocker bugs?
> 
> How can we see a global view of all open bugs? Aggregate from X upstream bug report systems? Which not all are Bugzilla?
> 
> How can we track critical bugs?

Additional concerns I'd have above this:

- Not all things we ship have active upstream bug trackers to fall back on
- We still need a way to track Fedora-specific integration & packaging
  concerns, which would likely get closed upstream as 'NOTABUG' for that
  project
- What filing downstream gives the Fedora maintainer is a good mechanism 
  for knowing what's going on in that package in Fedora. Tracking *all*
  upstream bugs in a bug tracker may not be a good way to do so.

Honestly, I think a good dedicated triage team that works to verify and move
upstream as appropriate works better. But, you know, requires getting and
keeping such a team.

Bill
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux