On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:07:04 -0400 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jan Wildeboer (jwildebo@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > How will you track blocker bugs? > > > > How can we see a global view of all open bugs? Aggregate from X > > upstream bug report systems? Which not all are Bugzilla? > > > > How can we track critical bugs? > > Additional concerns I'd have above this: > > - Not all things we ship have active upstream bug trackers to fall > back on > - We still need a way to track Fedora-specific integration & packaging > concerns, which would likely get closed upstream as 'NOTABUG' for > that project > - What filing downstream gives the Fedora maintainer is a good > mechanism for knowing what's going on in that package in Fedora. > Tracking *all* upstream bugs in a bug tracker may not be a good way > to do so. > > Honestly, I think a good dedicated triage team that works to verify > and move upstream as appropriate works better. But, you know, > requires getting and keeping such a team. we are missing a tool that would clone the Fedora bugs from bugzilla to upstream bug trackers. I think the removal of the manual work needed to copy all the information from bugzilla to upstream tracker would be appreciated by the packagers. I have the idea for the tool for quite some time, but didn't find the time to realize it :-( Dan -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
