On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:20:05 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/01/2013 08:19 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > By the way, I see this topic relevant just for developers of one of > > Fedora QA apps, it doesn't really influence the testers community > > in any way - the email notifications influence them (and the > > solution is clear there), not the trac location. So I wouldn't > > waste too much time on discussions and explanations here. Let's try > > the trac-defaultcc-plugin, if it doesn't work we can try something > > else. > > I have been looking into replacing trac with an actual request > tracker application thus starting to tie us to specific trac plugins > and any other functionality in track is a NO GO and will just hurt us > in the long run so I rather see an specific qa-devel trac instance > which could act as an bug tracker for what's being develop in the QA > Community then having us start relying to much on trac. I don't see how using the defaultcc plugin would hurt us in the long run any more than using trac in general would. It sends email notifications for a compnent's tickets to a different list - so what? I don't see how that would make any eventual migration to a new tracker system any more or less difficult. Out of curiosity, which tracker system are you looking into? Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
