On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:37:01 -0700 Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There has already been a thread here on this topic [1] but after it > came up in the Fedora QA meeting yesterday, we decided to make an > actual proposal. > > [1]http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-February/113898.html > > The concern raised is that notifications for development related > tickets for the blocker tracking app are out of place on the Test > list. > > To solve this, we have a couple of options: > > 1. Start using the defaultcc plugin for trac such that emails for the > blocker tracking app are directed to a new qa-devel@ list > > 2. Move all development related tickets out of the Fedora QA trac into > a new trac instance for the blocker tracking app which uses qa-devel@ > for notifications. > > 3. Move all development related tickets to a different existing trac > (probably autoqa) > > Personally, I don't have any really strong feelings about (1) or (2). > (1) is probably a little less work in the short term but (2) isn't a > bad idea. I'm somewhat strongly -1 on (3), though - If I need to go > through and do the work of moving tickets and changing settings, I > don't really want to be hacking up another project's trac instance. > > I've already started a thread on autoqa-devel@ asking about combining > that list with a new qa-devel@ [2]. The initial response has been > positive - I don't expect that will be a problem. > > [2]https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-devel/2013-February/003519.html > > Anyhow, thoughts on the possible solutions or how much work the > problem is worth? There hasn't been much of a response to this yet, so I'm assuming that everyone is OK with the idea of (1) and keeping the blocker tracking app bugs on the fedora-qa trac. If we're going to migrate to a new trac instance, I'd rather do it soon (in the next week) since we're getting close to the F19 branch date. On a related note, the proposal to consolidate autoqa-devel@ and other QA development discussion on to a single list went over well and we've started migrating over to the new qa-devel@ list [1] [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
