On 02/28/2013 11:51 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:37:01 -0700
Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There has already been a thread here on this topic [1] but after it
came up in the Fedora QA meeting yesterday, we decided to make an
actual proposal.
[1]http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-February/113898.html
The concern raised is that notifications for development related
tickets for the blocker tracking app are out of place on the Test
list.
To solve this, we have a couple of options:
1. Start using the defaultcc plugin for trac such that emails for the
blocker tracking app are directed to a new qa-devel@ list
2. Move all development related tickets out of the Fedora QA trac into
a new trac instance for the blocker tracking app which uses qa-devel@
for notifications.
3. Move all development related tickets to a different existing trac
(probably autoqa)
Personally, I don't have any really strong feelings about (1) or (2).
(1) is probably a little less work in the short term but (2) isn't a
bad idea. I'm somewhat strongly -1 on (3), though - If I need to go
through and do the work of moving tickets and changing settings, I
don't really want to be hacking up another project's trac instance.
I've already started a thread on autoqa-devel@ asking about combining
that list with a new qa-devel@ [2]. The initial response has been
positive - I don't expect that will be a problem.
[2]https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-devel/2013-February/003519.html
Anyhow, thoughts on the possible solutions or how much work the
problem is worth?
There hasn't been much of a response to this yet, so I'm assuming that
everyone is OK with the idea of (1) and keeping the blocker tracking
app bugs on the fedora-qa trac. If we're going to migrate to a new
trac instance, I'd rather do it soon (in the next week) since we're
getting close to the F19 branch date.
Did we not agree moving this into it's separated tracker or use autoqa one?
On a related note, the proposal to consolidate autoqa-devel@ and other
QA development discussion on to a single list went over well and we've
started migrating over to the new qa-devel@ list [1]
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
If autoqa is going to be using that mailing list as well then it makes
sense to move into their tracker as well.
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
