On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:58:46 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > To solve this, we have a couple of options: > > > > 1. Start using the defaultcc plugin for trac such that emails for > > the blocker tracking app are directed to a new qa-devel@ list > > I don't expect blocker bugs app to grow into monstrous dimensions > (should I?), so I don't see a problem keeping it in Fedora QA trac. > As long as we send the notifications to qa-devel, it's fine. And we > can always adjust in the future. I don't see it growing a whole lot for F19, no. Depending on how we approach some ideas for changing the blocker process in the future, things might grow a bit but I'm of the opinion that we can cross that bridge if/when we get there. For now, I think the question is more of "should devel tickets be in the qa trac?" instead of "are there enough tickets to justify moving them to a different instance?" Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
