On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:46 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote: > On 09/26/2012 10:37 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > I personally split maintainers in the distribution into three > > categories. > > > > 1. Packager > > > > 2, Maintainer > > > > 3. Upstream maintainer > > Is this an argument for an additional Fedora package class? At present, > it seems there are two well-defined types: "critical path" and > "everything else". If gcc is broken, it is a larger issue (it affects a > much greater number of users) than when something is wrong with > gnome-games. A person who principally uses Fedora to run "Mines" or > "Sudoku" may feel differently. > > Some distributions have a "user-contributed" category (often a separate > repository) that formally recognizes packages that are not maintained and > tested, or handled in a more casual way than packages with a defined > support structure. We could have one of those, and call it 'Fedora Extras' ;) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
