On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > drago01 (drago01@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> > There is no default 'package set' now (by design, it's not a bug). >> >> This *is* a bug IMO. We should have reasonable defaults and allow the >> user to change them if he wants. But we should not force the user to >> make choices that way. A user would have to know the differences >> between the options to be able to make an informed decision. In case >> the user has this knowledge he/she can open the spoke and change the >> selection. In case the user doesn't it might more or less end up in a >> random/wrong change. > > If the user can't make a choice, they should be using a live image, IMO; > the entire point of the DVD install has always been that it provided > a choice of things for the user to install. Instead of the prior DVD, > which offered a variety of co-dependent groups for the user to slice > and dice at will (often finding new ways to break their system), the idea of > the current installation is that it provides a set of pre-defined > installation choices on the left, all of which should install functional > systems (and pretty much resemeble the existing spins.) Sure but what's wrong with providing a default choice? It does not conflict with the goal of providing a choice. The user is still free to uncheck the checkbox if he really knows what he is doing. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
