On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 08:18 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:33:57 -0400 (EDT) > Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The two mockups that I'm looking at right now (identical other than > > > the table column ordering) are: > > > http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/blockerbugs/reskin-draft3/blockers-3.html > > > http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/blockerbugs/reskin-draft3/blockers.html > > > > Tim, I love it! > > > > The first way of column ordering seems better to me. > > I've been going back and forth between the two column layouts - one > follows the idea that the primary key (bug_id) is on the far right and > the second most important key (status, changed indicator, update info) > is on the far right to make scanning the table easier for either the > primary or secondary key. FWIW, having the status key on the far right seemed a little more natural to me in terms of scanning. It implies an order of 1) what am I looking at, 2)what's the high-level detail I need to know about it, and 3) what's the status. The other column order winds up splitting the description between two status oriented columns. But I really like the look regardless. Just my 2 cents worth... Hope it's helpful! Chris -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
