Hey, folks. During F17 cycle we added some validation tests for writing images to USB, but we don't have explicit criteria covering this. I'm proposing two new criteria for this, and a minor adjustment to an existing criterion. Alpha: Change existing criterion: * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on those architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media To: * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on those architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media when written to an optical disc Add new criterion: * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on those architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media when written to a USB stick with at least one of the [[How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB|officially supported methods]] Beta: Add new criterion: * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on those architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media when written to a USB stick with any of the [[How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB|officially supported methods]] The idea here is that at Alpha stage it must be possible to create a working USB stick _somehow_, and at Beta stage, all methods should be working. We could push the second criterion out to Final, I guess, but to me, this is becoming pretty core functionality. Seems like writing images to a stick is as common or more common than using actual media nowadays. Comments? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
