> * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary > architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on > those > architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install > media > when written to an optical disc > > Add new criterion: > > * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary > architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on > those > architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install > media > when written to a USB stick with at least one of the > [[How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB|officially supported methods]] Why don't we merge these two? ..... when written to an optical disc, or to a USB stick with at least one of the officially supported methods One criterion instead of two. Less text. > Beta: > > Add new criterion: > > * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary > architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on > those > architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install > media > when written to a USB stick with any of the > [[How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB|officially supported methods]] > > The idea here is that at Alpha stage it must be possible to create a > working USB stick _somehow_, and at Beta stage, all methods should be > working. We could push the second criterion out to Final, I guess, > but > to me, this is becoming pretty core functionality. Seems like writing > images to a stick is as common or more common than using actual media > nowadays. Agreed, USB sticks are getting used more and more. Beta stage sounds reasonable. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
