Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:55 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Michael Hennebry wrote:

Which of these should I worry about?
[root@localhost ~]# grep -v stall install.log
warning: fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-2.fc15.noarch: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID a82ba4b7: NOKEY /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.70BdJf: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file or directory warning: %post(tomcat-servlet-3.0-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pKiL8w: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file or directory warning: %post(tomcat-jsp-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.NaLh0X: line 3: find: command not found /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hawg7Q: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file or directory warning: %post(tomcat-el-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 Running in chroot, ignoring request. SELinux: Could not downgrade policy file /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26, searching for an older version. SELinux: Could not open policy file <= /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26: No such file or directory
load_policy:  Can't load policy:  No such file or directory
6874 blocks
*** FINISHED INSTALLING PACKAGES ***


getenforce says Disabled, I expect because of the above Could nots.
Is this something that wold be fixed with an auto-relabel?

Are you somehow missing the selinux-policy-targeted package? That should
have the file in question.

I think this says that I have it, but not the most recent:
[root@localhost ~]# yum info selinux-policy-targeted
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
fedora/metalink | 21 kB 00:00 updates/metalink | 7.4 kB 00:00 updates | 4.5 kB 00:00 updates/primary_db | 4.7 MB 00:07 updates/group_gz | 435 kB 00:00 Installed Packages
Name        : selinux-policy-targeted
Arch        : noarch
Version     : 3.10.0
Release     : 80.fc16
Size        : 12 M
Repo        : installed
From repo   : updates
Summary     : SELinux targeted base policy
URL         : http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/
License     : GPLv2+
Description : SELinux Reference policy targeted base module.

Available Packages
Name        : selinux-policy-targeted
Arch        : noarch
Version     : 3.10.0
Release     : 84.fc16
Size        : 3.5 M
Repo        : updates
Summary     : SELinux targeted base policy
URL         : http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/
License     : GPLv2+
Description : SELinux Reference policy targeted base module.

Also:
[root@localhost ~]# locate update-alternatives
/usr/sbin/update-alternatives
/usr/share/man/man8/update-alternatives.8.gz
[root@localhost ~]# locate tomcat-el-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch
[root@localhost ~]# which find
/bin/find
[root@localhost ~]# locate policy.26
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26
[root@localhost ~]# ls -l /bin/find /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  189736 May 11  2011 /bin/find
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4238308 Mar 13 06:21 /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26
[root@localhost ~]#

The RPM post errors could be reported as bugs in those packages, though
they may be 'false errors', I guess. It _looks_ like those packages
aren't properly requiring tools they execute in their %post scripts.

What should I do about the messages?
Would yum reinstalling some packages, e.g. selinux-policy-targeted, help?
What are the consequences of just ignoring them?

--
Michael   hennebry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"On Monday, I'm gonna have to tell my kindergarten class,
whom I teach not to run with scissors,
that my fiance ran me through with a broadsword."  --  Lily
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux