On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:19 +0100, agraham wrote: > On 09/08/2011 02:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey, all. pjones pointed out at a recent blocker review meeting that the > > Beta virt criterion: > > > > "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation > > where the virtual host is running the same release (using Fedora's > > current preferred virtualization technology)" > > > > doesn't really imply that virtual host functionality must work; only > > that _if_ virtual host functionality is working, then virtual guest > > functionality must work. This was not really our intent with the > > criterion, we intended to require both to work at Beta stage. So here's > > a proposed improvement: > > > > "The release must be able to self-host using Fedora's current preferred > > virtualization technology: that is, the release must be able to act as a > > virtual host, and must also successfully install and boot as a virtual > > guest when running on a host which is also running the release" > > > > I'm still not super happy with the wording, but I guess it's clearer. > > Any better ideas? > > Suggestions: > > A Fedora release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same > Fedora release. Thanks again for this suggestion, Albert. Following this discussion I went ahead and amended the Beta criteria to: The release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same release, using Fedora's current preferred virtualization technology The release must install and boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation where the virtual host is running the previous stable Fedora release, using Fedora's current preferred virtualization technology This should cover all the situations it's intended to cover. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
