On 10/14/2011 03:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Thanks again for this suggestion, Albert. Following this discussion I > went ahead and amended the Beta criteria to: > > The release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same > release, using Fedora's current preferred virtualization technology What happens if we have multiple supported virt technology (that is, suppose F17 supports both xen dom0 and kvm out of the box) - should the be worded to cover all supported virt tech, or is it limited to just one technology (and if so, which)? > > The release must install and boot successfully as a virtual guest in a > situation where the virtual host is running the previous stable Fedora > release, using Fedora's current preferred virtualization technology That's confusing, as the preferred virtualization technology may have changed between releases. For arguments sake, we know F16 prefers kvm, and let's suppose F17 goes back to xen as default. Does that mean F17 has to boot successfully as a guest in an F16 xen situation, or that F17 has to boot successfully both as a xen guest of F17 and as a kvm guest of F16? Given both those points, I suggest we alter the wording to something like this: The release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same release, using each of Fedora's current preferred virtualization technologies. The release must install and boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation where the virtual host is running the previous stable Fedora release, using each of the preferred virtualization technologies of that prior release. -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
