On 09/08/2011 02:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, all. pjones pointed out at a recent blocker review meeting that the > Beta virt criterion: > > "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation > where the virtual host is running the same release (using Fedora's > current preferred virtualization technology)" > > doesn't really imply that virtual host functionality must work; only > that _if_ virtual host functionality is working, then virtual guest > functionality must work. This was not really our intent with the > criterion, we intended to require both to work at Beta stage. So here's > a proposed improvement: > > "The release must be able to self-host using Fedora's current preferred > virtualization technology: that is, the release must be able to act as a > virtual host, and must also successfully install and boot as a virtual > guest when running on a host which is also running the release" > > I'm still not super happy with the wording, but I guess it's clearer. > Any better ideas? Suggestions: A Fedora release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same Fedora release. I think the last part of the original sentence is redundant. However, I'd prefer: A Fedora release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same Fedora release as well as all previous Fedora releases. "Current preferred virtualization technology:" Is too ambiguous, lets call a spade a space and state KVM if that statement is required. Albert -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
