On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > During Final blocker review meetings, we've come up against a couple of > bugsto do with missing translations that we'd like to consider for Final > blocker status: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706756 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676488 > > however we don't currently actually have any criteria that cover i18n > (translation) issues. We should probably require some basic level of > translation to be in place for particularly popular languages. How about > a Final criterion, something like: > > * The installer, bootup and login processes should correctly display all > translations that are available for use > > the intent is that where the translation team has actually provided > translations of this key content, they should be displayed, but we're > not going to block on no translations being available for some language > or another. Taking into consideration the list feedback, and some issues that came up at the meeting, we agreed to accept this substantially modified text during the blocker review meeting today: "All critical path actions on release-blocking desktop environments should correctly display all sufficiently complete translations available for use" this covers updating, and re-uses the existing critpath definition so we're not re-inventing it. 'critical path actions' will be a link to the critpath wiki page. I'll add this to the Final criteria shortly. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
