On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> "AM" == Anne Mulhern <amulhern@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > AM> The question assumes that the upstream had deliberately chosen the > AM> name for this meaning, that it wasn't an accidental match, as in > AM> debugger or manuscript. > > If you have an upstream which does such a thing, what are the chances > that the software they're producing is actually useful? If it's useful, > it should stand on its merits and not the name. And if it's just crap, > then there probably isn't much point in adding it to the distribution. > I would assume that any such software would tend towards the 'crap' end > of the spectrum, but it's an infinite universe.... The word "git" actually has a pretty rude standard meaning. -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
