On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:29:58AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > > dvb-apps will (at least on current Fedora releases, maybe not on > > Rawhide) require dtv-scan-tables but there is no need for > > dtv-scan-tables to require dvb-apps afaics. > > > Conflicts: dvb-apps <= NEVR_OF_PACKAGE_BEFORE_SPLIT > > would not violate the spirit of the guideline. The guideline was written > so that people could always install the latest packages from the repo > regardless of what other packages they have installed. Having the version > in the conflicts allows that to continue to be the case. IMHO the spirit should be mentioned more explicit to make understanding the reason for the guidelines better: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/315 > I thought that the Optional feature portion of the guideline would cover > this explicitly but it looks like it doesn't. The FPC should probably add > this as another case where (versioned) conflicts are acceptable so that that > is clear. > > If you'd like to open a ticket, that can be done. I created a draft: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/316 Regards Till -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
