On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:07:24AM +0300, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:01:13 +0200 > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > it seems to me that > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts > > does not cover a case for conflicts that might occur if a package is > > split. Here is the bug report about the intended split: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952326 > > > > Basically dvb-apps currently contains a plaintext file based database > > in /usr/share/dvb/dvb-t/ which is supposed to provided by a new > > backage, dtv-scan-tables. Since the individual files might differ, > > conflicts can occur here, which is why it seems that the new > > dtv-scan-table package should use "Conflict: dvb-apps < > > VERSION-RELEASE" for the version/release that does not contain the > > database anymore to confclit with all previous versions. > > Uhh, isn't this handled by just making both dtv-scan-tables and > dvb-apps Obsoletes: dvb-apps < VERSION-RELEASE? Sorry, I forgot to mention that dvb-apps also contains other content, such as programs and libs, therefore it will continue to exist. As far as I understand, Obsoletes would cause dvb-apps to be removed when dtc-scan-tables is installed. The condition is more: If dtv-scan-tables is installed, then dvb-apps must not be installed or it must be installed with at least a certain version/release. Regards Till -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
