Re: fedora-usermgmt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Bacula package already has a registered user group of 33 in:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry

so I will keep on using that; no change. The spec file always
contained that uid/gid in the build.
What I will change is just the way it is created, and the link Tom
sent is exactly the one I was looking at.
I found fedora-usermgmt already in place in the spec file so I thought
it was right to ask.

Thank you very much,
--Simone



On 19 December 2011 20:07, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Simone Caronni wrote:
>>
>> After a day of frustration I looked at other packages spec files that
>> define uid/gid <100, and I saw that many of them don't use
>> fedora-usermgmt at all (i.e. NetworkManager-openconnect):
>>
> Also, please do not use a uid/gid below 100.
>
> If you do need a static uid defined in the spec file (but please read the
> link spot gave for other ways to achieve most of the same things)  we'll
> need to talk about what numbers are not used and who you need to talk to to
> get it assigned.
>
> -Toshio



-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux