On 04/20/2009 11:50 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > But the packager is generating the tarball listed in Source0....so > wouldn't this then be that the packager must include the license from > the original upstream tarball used to generate the Source0 tarball. And > preferably, they should include that license in the Source0 tarball? Hmm. Okay, yeah, if the packager is making a custom tarball from the larger one, they should include the license text in the custom tarball. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
