On 04/20/2009 06:28 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote: > The question at hand is not whether the tarball contains inlined or > detached licenses. The question is which tarball the guideline refers > to. If it is the large upstream installer it does include a detached > license file. If it is the extracted tarball it does not. *puts on his Fedora Legal hat* Does the tarball that you're using as Source0 (or whatever Source lines are in the spec) contain a separate (and relevant) license text file? If so, you MUST have it as %doc. If not, you (the packager) can choose to add it to the package as %doc if you want, but you are NOT required to do so. Hope that helps, ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
