On 04/20/2009 06:28 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote: > The question at hand is not whether the tarball contains inlined or > detached licenses. The question is which tarball the guideline refers > to. If it is the large upstream installer it does include a detached > license file. If it is the extracted tarball it does not. I want to make clear that the disagreement does not depend on whether we extract source tarballs from a larger tree or not. Let me talk over a toy example to demonstrate the situation: Suppose I am packaging MyApp. MyApp source tree has this layout: src/A/ src/B/ I am making MyApp-A and MyApp-B subpackages. Now there is a COPYING file under src/A/ Should I put that COPYING file into the %doc of the MyApp-B package, if - B requires A? - B doesn't require A? Let's make this clear, so that we can apply the general consensus on the new packages. Orcan -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
