Axel Thimm wrote : > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:06:52PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Friday 06 April 2007 13:52:12 Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > I would recommend at least one rebuild of a package just before release > > > though for everything but pure data packages. I've been surprised by > > > what has changed and caused failures. > > > > Continuous rebuilds are done, just not imported. I think this is great, we > > get the benefit without the churn. Churning the entire package set without > > reason is ridiculous and may do more harm than good. See Matt D's > > core/extras rebuild reports. > > But nobody tests them. Only fatal build errors are probed that way. IIRC this is not true : A rebuild is also considered "failed" if it creates packages with different requires or provides than the ones from the packages in the repository. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.20-1.2943.fc6 Load : 0.70 0.67 1.01 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
