Patrice Dumas schrieb: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:04:56PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: >> o continue suggesting the use of disttags to new packagers - even >> though optional it should be the recommended way to package things >> up. > But remember that for data noarch packages, and software noarch packages > that don't in stall in versionned interpreter directory disttages are > harmfull. harmfull maybe is a bit strong word, but you have a point. I also plan to remove disttags from those of my packages that update seldom, as I think it's just utterly confusing if there are packages in FC7 that still have a disttag ".fc6" in it. CU thl -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
