Patrice Dumas schrieb: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 02:28:20PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Those 982 packages are in my opinion good candidates for not using dist. > That's not completly evident. Among those packages there are a lot of > arch packages that weren't updated nor rebuilt, yet disttag for those > packages are convenient. That why I said "candidates" -- it of course depends on the package itself (maybe it was just a slow devel period upstream with no releases) and the maintainer, if he is willing to take care of some things manually that dists automates. CU thl -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
