Re: Is this license okay for a fedora package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"JW" == Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

JW> Another thing to consider... How different is this from the
JW> Firefox case?

Firefox has no requirement that it carry any display or notice as far
as I know.  In fact, Debian removes these completely.  The license in
question explicitly prohibits this.  It seems to be in fact the polar
opposite from the Firefox case.

I think I was somehow abstractly attempting to tie them together via "mostly free, but has some sort of restriction relating to included graphics, which is what made debian give it the boot". Or something. Okay, just ignore that thought.

--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux