On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:09 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "JW" == Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > JW> I'd like to package up Maia Mailguard, and the license appears to > JW> be original BSD (advertising clause included) with a branding > JW> extension added. Thoughts? > > In a way it's sort of like the GFDL with its invariant section. I > personally think that kind of thing renders the software "non-free", > but I'm not a lawyer. Not sure if that license is free, to me it stinks, but in any case the GFDL is a Documentation License, not a Software License, let's keep apples to apples comparisons, and let's try to not get infected by the Debian disease about defining what is software. Simo. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
