>>>>> "JW" == Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: JW> I'd like to package up Maia Mailguard, and the license appears to JW> be original BSD (advertising clause included) with a branding JW> extension added. Thoughts? In a way it's sort of like the GFDL with its invariant section. I personally think that kind of thing renders the software "non-free", but I'm not a lawyer. See also http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/02/msg00178.html - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
