Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 22:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 14:05 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
In this case, I'd be okay with the changes to iconcache with
1) the addition of Requires(post): xdg-utils
I forgot to mention, that this approach must be special-case, to only be
for Extras packages, since xdg-utils isn't in Core (yet).
My original proposal applies equally well to all Core/Extras packages,
for any FC release.
My feeling is it's broken on Core since xdg-utils isn't present there.
If by "broken", you *really* mean: "regressing" causing gtk2 app
performance degradation until gtk2 is fixed, then yes.
My proposal forces the issue. If you have to Requires(post): xdg-utils,
you have to have it in Core (or the Core equivalent).
Force what? It is impossible to get xdg-utils into pre FC-7 Core.
That's why I mentioned it would have to be an (imo overly complicated)
special-case for FC-7+ only.
-- Rex
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
