On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 15:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > I posted this proposal awhile back: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/iconcache > > Don't remember seeing much (any?) feedback, so everyone must agree with it. > (: > > I'd like to get this discussed and ratified by the committee. I wrote something but it was much after the fact and in a totally different thread. Here's my comments: ''' I'm sorry I missed the initial announcement of this. I think your revisions make sense after xdg-utils go into Core and the requirement tree for gtk2 is in place (hicolor-icon-theme should work fine for this). Changing the guidelines before that would break things that currently work. (Or we could place a hard Require:s on xdg-utils until it was fixed.) Is there an RFE open to get xdg-utils into Core and make the necessary changes? If the relevant maintainers think it's a good change we can mention that the suggested scriptlet is changing in FCX. '''[1]_ [1]_ https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00011.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
