Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 à 14:02 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit : > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 20:55 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 à 13:22 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit : > > > > > The example is poor in that aspect. If you assume that foo-game needs > > > bar, but will not work with older versions of bar (this is the normal > > > case), then the example holds. I'll update the wording to reflect this. > > > > Please also make sure your proposal covers the case explained there : > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-November/msg00026.html > > I think the rationale presented there for Conflicts use is OK. > > Again, the policy is "No use of Conflicts: without good reason". If you > have a good reason, we'll approve it, you document it in the spec, and > we all move on. :) Operation "have spot document my conflict on his wiki page" failed Damn :) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
