On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:50:12 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > "Tom 'spot' Callaway" writes: > > > I drafted a proposal for when it is ok to use Conflicts: (almost never): > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts > > The statement > > | My package, foo-game doesn't work when bar is older than 1.2.3. > | WRONG: Conflicts: bar < 1.2.3 > | RIGHT: Requires: bar >= 1.2.3 > > is wrong and should be the opposite. There should not be added a Requires: > when package 'foo' works without 'bar' but fails with 'bar < 1.2.3'. > > > Popular example is the 'kernel' package. Lot of packages won't work with > kernel 2.4 but it would be wrong to Require: the 'kernel' package. What does Anaconda do during a dist upgrade in that case? -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
