On Friday 10 November 2006 14:44, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Did this break post-FC6? If so, it might be reasonable to move > towards living with no Python in the buildroot. Having the minimal > buildroot actually be minimal is a worthy goal. Yes, it appears this is post-fc6, at what point I haven't researched/figured out yet. > However, this would mean that Python module specfiles will have to > adapt to some method like what Ruby and PHP modules have to cope with, > where the interpreters aren't there during the first pass through the > specfile. Generally this is pretty simple to handle. Yeah, and it would mean either doing fun if wrappers on fedora version or forking spec files between devel and FC6<= -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpx7OwksqJfA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
