Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > You should probably also mention /etc/ld.so.conf.d. Since that's (should be!) already referenced in /etc/ld.so.conf, I figured it didn't need to be explictly mentioned. Maybe I was being too optimistic. > I hope it's not > necessary to note specifically that a package can't have .la files in > directories that it adds to the ld search path. I hope that too. (: -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
