Re: desktop-file-install --vendor=... proposal, comments?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

> For some reason that confuses me a bit.  The first line after the
> example says "we're going to talk about --vendor in the context of the
> menu spec", then the first item says not to use --vendor at all and
> the second item talks about KDE and --dir.
> 
> Plus, I'm not sure how I'm supposed to know if the upstream provides
> vendor_id.

OK, I updated the draft to include 2 examples, one
using --vendor=<vendor_id> the other using
--dir=%buildroot%_datadir/applications/<vendor_id> --vendor=""

and included language from the spec describing the difference (hopefully):

-------------------
To prevent that a desktop entry from one party inadvertently cancels out the
desktop entry from another party because both happen to get the same
desktop-file id it is recommended that providers of desktop-files ensure
that all desktop-file ids start with a vendor prefix... Please namespace
the filename, as in "vendor-foo.desktop", or use a subdirectory of
datadir/applications/ so you have "vendor/foo.desktop"...
-----------------


-- Rex


--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux