Rex Dieter wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
NamingGuidelines (mostly) only pertain to *new* changelog entries.
Maintaining old ones as-is is important to see the history of the
package. 0.fdr.2 dates back to the fedora.us days.
The Packaging Guidelines describe how new changelog entries should the
added and this example is used to show how new changelog entries
should be added. Since it is not correct anymore it should be changed
to a current, valid one.
No biggie, though that's not one including in the section labeled "You
must use one of the following (changelog) formats"... (:
OK, Guideline updated to remove reference to 0.fdr in changelog example.
-- Rex
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
