Till Maas wrote:
what information about E-V-R should be in changelog entries?
In
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213
the first example is:
* Wed Jun 14 2003 Joe Packager <joe at gmail.com> - 0:1.0-0.fdr.2
This seems to contain %{?dist} (fdr) but the other examples do not. This is
irritating. And as far as I understand the NamingGuidelines 0.fdr.2 is not a
valid release tag nowadays.
NamingGuidelines (mostly) only pertain to *new* changelog entries.
Maintaining old ones as-is is important to see the history of the
package. 0.fdr.2 dates back to the fedora.us days.
-- Rex
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
