Re: Re: Should packages really own their config files???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 16:00 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:14:49PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > I argued for such a rule, but others pointed out examples where this is
> > not always/generally a good idea, so the proposal did not have the
> > support to pass.
> 
> Were the examples for certificate/ssh keys only? I don't really meant
> these with "config files". Are there any arguments against owning
> config files but certifcates/ssh keys?

I don't recall anything except certificates.  The log of that meeting is
here:
  http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/IRCLog20060727

Relevant timeframe: (09:33:08) - (09:59:24)

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux