On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:14:49PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 18:03 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > >> Isn't this handled in some guidelines? If not shouldn't it? > > > > I thought we had a rule about creating files in %post or whatnot and not > > owning them. I could be wrong, but I check for that when I review > > packages. IMHO any file a package creates on the file system at install > > time should be owned or ghosted by that package. > > I argued for such a rule, but others pointed out examples where this is > not always/generally a good idea, so the proposal did not have the > support to pass. Were the examples for certificate/ssh keys only? I don't really meant these with "config files". Are there any arguments against owning config files but certifcates/ssh keys? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpHM2ZYEn326.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
