Of course they should (IMO), the subject is just for catching your attention. But prominent rpm persona think otherwise - Jeff Johnson considers rpm owning its own /etc/rpm/config file wrong and even questions that there exists a convention of packages owning their config files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204606 Isn't this handled in some guidelines? If not shouldn't it? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpxkVgq0Dwzj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
