On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 16:56 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:58:03PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > I suggest to vote through email [...] > > > > 5 voted, 5 still to go. Can the remaining committee members do their > > voting business, please? Maybe we get this rejected and all can be > > happy again ;) > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AxelThimm/kmdls/voting > > > > I added Ville's votes (and copied them verbatim for Toshio on his > > wish) but the first because he made it indirectly dependent on the > > outcome: Ville & Toshio you need to decide on the first item, if you > > are not sure better reject than accept, but don't conditionalize, it > > makes vote counting difficult. :) > > > > Note: Don't use "0", it's the same as "-1" in fedora-packaging. > > As a committee we need to decide on certain items either positive or > negative. Allowing discussion before voting is OK, but having a > stalled voting over weeks isn't really an advertisment for our work. > > Please vote within the next day until Wed 16:00UTC. I'll consider the > missing votes as "-1", but mark them as "0" to distinguish from the > actual votes. I vote -1 on all items, not because KMDL has anything incorrect, but because I do not wish to overhaul an existing standard, rather than correct the flaws present in it. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
