Re: Absolute symlinks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:04:16AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Here's rpmlint's reasoning: 
>   'Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot
> environments.'

In that sense every symlink is danergerous including relative ones: if
it contains too many ".." you'll end up outside the chroot anyway if
accessed from outside. If accessed from inside the chroot, absolute
paths are even securer when being root.

Chroots (with external access, e.g. not within) aren't used by package
consumers, but package builders and testers.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpEiOmT2mfQc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux