On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:58:03PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > I suggest to vote through email [...] > > 5 voted, 5 still to go. Can the remaining committee members do their > voting business, please? Maybe we get this rejected and all can be > happy again ;) > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AxelThimm/kmdls/voting > > I added Ville's votes (and copied them verbatim for Toshio on his > wish) but the first because he made it indirectly dependent on the > outcome: Ville & Toshio you need to decide on the first item, if you > are not sure better reject than accept, but don't conditionalize, it > makes vote counting difficult. :) > > Note: Don't use "0", it's the same as "-1" in fedora-packaging. As a committee we need to decide on certain items either positive or negative. Allowing discussion before voting is OK, but having a stalled voting over weeks isn't really an advertisment for our work. Please vote within the next day until Wed 16:00UTC. I'll consider the missing votes as "-1", but mark them as "0" to distinguish from the actual votes. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp0VbY2wDv00.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
