Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #8 from S.A. Hartsuiker <sahartsu@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-29 17:28:25 EDT --- RPM Lint: no, see previous post Package name: see previous post Spec file: ok License: GPLv2 Actual License: GPLv2 %doc License: ok (COPYING) Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok Compile and Build: - F-7: n/a - F-8: n/a - rawhide: builds - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: not applicable Shared libs: not applicable Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: see above No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: see above Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: ok %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: not applicable Static Libraries in -static package: not applicable pkgconfig Requires: not applicable Library files: ok Devel requires base package: not applicable .la libtool archives: not applicable Duplicate ownership of files/directories: no Remove BuildRoot: yes UTF-8 filenames: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review