Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841 --- Comment #11 from Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-29 17:34:33 EDT --- > I've reviewed the various files that rpmlint flagged, and updated the specfile > to make most of them executable (they contain unit tests and simple utilities), > apart from one which isn't useful (removed shebang line). Great, thanks. > I've kept the conditional %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 to make it easier to share the > specfile with EPEL5 (I'm actually doing this on an EL5 box). Ah, that's ok. > I'm not seeing the SPARQLParserc.so permissions error on my local builds, and > in my scratch build I'm seeing 0755. Not sure what's going on here, just did a rebuild in mock (rawhide): ruben@slice python-rdflib]$ rpm -qplv python-rdflib-2.4.0-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm | grep SPARQLParserc.so -rwxrwxr-x 1 root root 225544 Sep 29 23:13 /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/rdflib/sparql/bison/SPARQLParserc.so Not a big issue though, maybe it has something to do with my mock setup. > Do you have some idea how to robustly strip that autogenerated "Provides: > SPARQLParserc.so"? Have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review