Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #7 from S.A. Hartsuiker <sahartsu@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-29 17:03:19 EDT --- $ rpmlint -i genome-1.3.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm genome.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. This should be fixed. genome-docs package maybe? $ rpmlint -i genome-cloudmasterd-1.3.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm genome-cloudmasterd.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name cloudmasterd The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. This should be fixed. $ rpmlint -i genome-debuginfo-1.3.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm genome-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable creation of the debuginfo package. What happened? Is this something to be worried about or not? $ rpmlint -i genome-firstboot-1.3.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm genome-firstboot.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/genome-firstboot The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. Should this start on installation? $ rpmlint -i genome-release-1.3.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm genome-release.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-genome A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. This should be fixed. $ rpmlint -i genome-repo-1.3.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm genome-repo.i386: E: non-executable-script /var/lib/puppet/modules/genomerepo/files/genome-reporter 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. Does this need executable bits? genome-repo.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/genome-repo-bootstrap The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. Should this start on installation? genome-repo.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name genome-repo-bootstrap The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. This should probably be fixed. $ rpmlint -i genome-server-1.3.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm genome-server.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/genomed The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. Should this start on installation? genome-server.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name genomed The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. Moot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review