https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283055 --- Comment #48 from Attila Kovacs <attipaci@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks again Daniel, I'll take your advice on the wildcards for the next update. The next upstream release will anyway require a few small tweaks to move away from the (bit) special treatment of this one, so I'll just add that to it. The whole platform dependent data also got me thinking... It's a relic for back compatibility with the original NOVAS C library, but it would be much nicer if that data was in a platform independent format. I guess, with a little work, I can change the code such that it can process both the legacy (platform-dependent data), and a new format that is platform independent (with some magic bytes at the head to identify the format). Then, in the future, the CIO locator data can be a `noarch`, and a lot of the related headaches will go away with it. I'll probably try to do that for the September upstream release. Also, I was thinking that I can give you write access to the .spec repo also (Smithsonian/supernovas-rpm-spec), in case you want to make tweaks yourself. Let me know. cheers, -- A. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283055 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283055%23c48 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
